Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Sullens et al
| Plaintiff: | Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
|---|
| Defendant: | Dale Sullens and Linda Johnston |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 4:2007cv00011 |
| Filed: | January 9, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Arizona District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Tucson Division Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Maricopa |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Cindy K Jorgenson |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Contract - Insurance |
| Cause: | 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Jurisdiction: | Diversity |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| January 9, 2007 | 8 | ORDER granting 6 Motion that the Clerk of the Court accept the check of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in the sum of $28,679.00, plus any applicable interest (Plan Benefits), with respect to this interpleader action and the deposit said c heck into the Registry Acct of the Court pursuant to 28 USC 2041 FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court and/or the Financial Deputy shall invest the Plan Benefits so deposited in the Registry Acct of this Court FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall issue its process directed to Dale Sullens and Linda Johnston, as "claimants", and shall be addressed to and personally served upon them where each claimant resides or may be found, if the claimants do not agree to waiver o f service under Rule 4(d), Fed.R.Civ.Proc. FURTHER ORDERED that said Claimants/Defendants, above-named, are hereby and herewith restrained from instituting or prosecuting any proceeding in any state or United States Court against MetLife,General Motors, or the Plan with respect to the Plan Benefits. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 1/8/07.(MAP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.