Votivo Ltd v. Amal Flores et al
| Case Number: | 2:2005cv02942 |
|---|---|
| Filed: | April 21, 2005 |
| Court: | California Central District Court [ Court Info ] |
| Presiding Judge: | Dean D. Pregerson |
| Referring Judge: | Charles F. Eick |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Trademark |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Votivo Ltd v. Amal Flores et al | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Votivo Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Amal Flores | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: California Intellectual Property Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.