L. F. P. Inc et al v. Cafepress.com, Inc et al
| Plaintiffs: | L. F. P. Inc, LFP IP, LLC and LFP Apparel, LLC |
|---|
| Defendants: | Cafepress.com, Inc and DOES |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 2:2007cv04401 |
| Filed: | July 6, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | California Central District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Los Angeles |
| Presiding Judge: | Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Referring Judge: | Andrew J. Wistrich |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Trademark |
| Cause: | 15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | Both |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| August 15, 2007 | 7 | STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. All counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, and the Local Rules of the Central District of California, this Court's Order for Jury Trial, and this Court's Order for Court Trial. See document for details. (gk) |
| August 20, 2007 | 8 | ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2007 02:00 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case. Parties are reminded of their obligation to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan, not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer. (gk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.