Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Rodman & Renshaw, LLC v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff:Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
Defendant:Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.
 
Case Number:2:2008cv01081
Filed:February 15, 2008
 
Court:California Central District Court
Office:Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: S James Otero
Referring Judge: Carolyn Turchin
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Trademark
Cause:15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Rodman & Renshaw, LLC v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.