Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name:
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Nike Inc v. Not For Noth'n LLC

Plaintiff:Nike Inc
Defendant:Not For Noth'N LLC
 
Case Number:2:2008cv01894
Filed:March 20, 2008
 
Court:California Central District Court
Office:Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:35:271 Patent Infringement
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Nike Inc v. Not For Noth'n LLC
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nike Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Defendant: Not For Noth'N LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.