Great American Insurance Company v. Sami Hindiyeh et al
| Plaintiff: | Great American Insurance Company |
|---|
| Defendant: | Sami Hindiyeh and Janet Hindiyeh |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 2:2008cv03301 |
|---|
| Filed: | May 19, 2008 |
|---|
| |
| Court: | California Central District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Western Division - Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ] |
|---|
| County: | XX US, Outside California |
|---|
| Presiding Judge: | Percy Anderson |
|---|
| Referring Judge: | Marc L. Goldman |
|---|
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Contract - Other Contract |
|---|
| Cause: | 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
|---|
| Jurisdiction: | Diversity |
|---|
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
|---|
| Amount Demanded: | $780,000.00 |
|---|
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| May 19, 2008 | 5 |  MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: Before the Court is plaintiff Great American Ins. Co.'s Application for Temporary Restraining Order 3. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff seeks, among other relief, the equitable remedy of quia timet to compel defendants Sami Hindiyeh and Janet Hindiyeh ("Defendants") to provide adequate security for bonds issued by Plaintiff which Defendants allegedly agreed to indemnify. Plaintiff requests the temporary restraining order be iss ued after a hearing. The Court orders Defendants to show cause why the temporary restraining order requested by Plaintiff should not issue. The Court sets a hearing on the Order to Show Cause for 6/16/2008 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. Plaint iff shall personally serve Defendants with this order and all other documents previously filed in this action no later than 5/23/2008. Once Defendants have been served, Plaintiff shall immediately file a Proof of Service with the Court. Defendants� 39; Opposition to the issuance of the temporary restraining order, if any, shall be filed by 6/5/2008. Plaintiff may file a Reply no later than 6/9/2008. Any failure by Defendants to appear or oppose the order to show cause may result in the issuance of the temporary restraining order without further notice from the Court. In reviewing the Complaint, it appears that Plaintiff has failed to allege properly any basis upon which this Court has jurisdiction. The Complaint has improperly alleged the citizenship of Defendants. The Court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's response to the Court's order to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed shall be filed by 6/9/2008. An Amended Complaint which cures the jurisdictional defects shall be considered an appropriate response to the order to show cause. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.