Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Hartgraves v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Plaintiff:David Hartgraves
Defendant:Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 
Case Number:2:2009cv01714
Filed:June 19, 2009
 
Court:California Eastern District Court
Office:Sacramento Office [ Court Info ]
County:San Joaquin
Presiding Judge:Judge John A. Mendez
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Banks and Banking
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$0.00
Search for this case: Hartgraves v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Hartgraves
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.