Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Adamson v. Butte Sand and Gravel Company

Plaintiff:Tami Adamson
Defendant:Butte Sand and Gravel Company
 
Case Number:2:2009cv01828
Filed:July 2, 2009
 
Court:California Eastern District Court
Office:Sacramento Office [ Court Info ]
County:Sacramento
Presiding Judge:Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$2,250,000.00
Search for this case: Adamson v. Butte Sand and Gravel Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tami Adamson
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Butte Sand and Gravel Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.