Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories

Plaintiff:SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline
Defendant:Abbott Laboratories
 
Case Number:3:2007cv05702
Filed:November 9, 2007
 
Court:California Northern District Court
Office:San Francisco Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:Hon. William H. Alsup
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.