Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Artifex Software Inc.
Defendant: Diebold Inc. and Premier Election Solutions
Case Number: 3:2008cv04837
Filed: October 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Copyright Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 Stipulation and Order, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 4/3/09 is continued to 5/29/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/2/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009)
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/3/09 is continued to 5/29/2008 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 3/30/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Motion Hearing set for 3/6/09 is continued to 4/3/2009 10:00 AM. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009)
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant's time to respond to the complaint to 1/23/09 (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)
December 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2008)
November 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by Premier Election Solutions, Diebold Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/12/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Artifex Software Inc.
Represented By: Darin Walter Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diebold Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Premier Election Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?