Artifex Software Inc. v. Diebold Inc. et al
Artifex Software Inc. |
Diebold Inc. and Premier Election Solutions |
3:2008cv04837 |
October 22, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Copyright Office |
Marin |
Edward M. Chen |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 Stipulation and Order, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 4/3/09 is continued to 5/29/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/2/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/3/09 is continued to 5/29/2008 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 3/30/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Motion Hearing set for 3/6/09 is continued to 4/3/2009 10:00 AM. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendant's time to respond to the complaint to 1/23/09 (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2008) |
Filing 7 ORDER re 6 Stipulation filed by Premier Election Solutions, Diebold Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/12/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.