Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Seidel v. United States of America

Plaintiff:Vicki R. Seidel
Defendant:United States of America
 
Case Number:5:2007cv03141
Filed:June 14, 2007
 
Court:California Northern District Court
Office:San Jose Office [ Court Info ]
County:Monterey
Presiding Judge:Hon. Jeremy Fogel
Presiding Judge:Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg
 
Nature of Suit:Federal Tax Suits - Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause:26:7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Seidel v. United States of America
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicki R. Seidel
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.