Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Cook v. Secretary of Treasury

Plaintiff:Michael Charles Cook
Defendant:Secretary of Treasury
 
Case Number:5:2009cv03214
Filed:July 15, 2009
 
Court:California Northern District Court
Office:San Jose Office [ Court Info ]
County:Lassen
Presiding Judge:Hon. James Ware
Presiding Judge:Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Property - Other Personal Property Damage
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Cook v. Secretary of Treasury
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Cook
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary of Treasury
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.