Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

DF-VIMARC CORPORATION v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.

Plaintiff: DF-VIMARC CORPORATION
Defendant: WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
 
Case Number: 1:2008cv00725
Filed: April 28, 2008
 
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Banks and Banking Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Judge John D. Bates
 
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Banks and Banking
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Amount Demanded: $230,000.00
Search for this case: DF-VIMARC CORPORATION v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DF-VIMARC CORPORATION
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.