Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

GEORGETOWN PARK PARTNERS LLC v. WHITE HOUSE/BLACK MARKET, INC.

Plaintiff:GEORGETOWN PARK PARTNERS LLC
Defendant:WHITE HOUSE/BLACK MARKET, INC.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv01696
Filed:September 4, 2009
 
Court:District Of Columbia District Court
Office:Washington, DC Office
County:88888
Presiding Judge:Judge Richard W. Roberts
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$122,000.00
Search for this case: GEORGETOWN PARK PARTNERS LLC v. WHITE HOUSE/BLACK MARKET, INC.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEORGETOWN PARK PARTNERS LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WHITE HOUSE/BLACK MARKET, INC.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.