Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
(What's this?)
What is the EasyEdit button?
This website gets better when people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help)
| Plaintiff: | Personalized User Model LLP |
|---|---|
| Defendant: | Google Inc. |
| Case Number: | 1:2009cv00525 |
| Filed: | July 16, 2009 |
| Court: | Delaware District Court |
| Office: | Wilmington Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | XX US, Outside State |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. |
| Presiding Judge: | Unassigned Judge |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Patent |
| Cause: | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| July 16, 2009 | 1 | COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Google Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 03110000000000609568.) - filed by Personalized User Model LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A and B, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dzs, ) |
| July 16, 2009 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (dzs, ) |
| July 16, 2009 | 3 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 filed by Personalized User Model LLP. (dzs, ) |
| July 17, 2009 | 4 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,981,040 B1; 7,320,031 B2; (dzs, ) |
| July 17, 2009 | 5 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Personalized User Model LLP. Google Inc. served on 7/17/2009, answer due 8/6/2009. (Louden, Karen) |
| July 24, 2009 | 6 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to September 8, 2009 - filed by Google Inc.. (Horwitz, Richard) |
| August 5, 2009 | 7 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Marc S. Friedman, Jimmy M. Shin, Yar R. Chaikovsky, Jennifer D. Bennett - filed by Personalized User Model LLP. (Louden, Karen) |
| September 8, 2009 | 8 | ANSWER to 1 Complaint, with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Personalized User Model LLP by Google Inc..(Moore, David) |
| September 8, 2009 | 9 | MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California - filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Motion, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, David) |
| September 8, 2009 | 10 | DECLARATION of Antonio Sistos re 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-9)(Moore, David) Modified on 9/9/2009 (nms). |
| September 8, 2009 | 11 | DECLARATION of John Labrre re 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California by Google Inc.. (Moore, David) Modified on 9/9/2009 (nms). |
| September 25, 2009 | 12 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian C. Cannon, Charles K. Verhoeven, David A. Perlson, Antonio R. Sistos and Eugene Novik - filed by Google Inc.. (Horwitz, Richard) |
| September 25, 2009 | 13 | ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Personalized User Model LLP.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 10/5/2009. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| September 25, 2009 | 14 | DECLARATION of Roy Twersky re 13 Answering Brief in Opposition by Personalized User Model LLP. (Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 9/28/2009 (nms). |
| September 25, 2009 | 15 | DECLARATION of re Jennifer Bennett re 13 Answering Brief Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California by by Personalized User Model LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits 1-2, # 2 Exhibits 3-5)(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 9/28/2009 (nms). |
| September 30, 2009 | 16 | ANSWER to 8 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Personalized User Model LLP.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| October 5, 2009 | 17 | REPLY BRIEF re 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Google Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| October 27, 2009 | 18 | MEMORANDUM OPINION re 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 10/27/2009. (nms) |
| October 27, 2009 | 19 |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Personalized User Model LLP | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
| Defendant: Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: XX US, Outside State County Patent Lawyers and Delaware Patent Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.