Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Neutrogena Corporation

Plaintiff:Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc.
Defendant:Neutrogena Corporation
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00642
Filed:August 27, 2009
 
Court:Delaware District Court
Office:Wilmington Office [ Court Info ]
County:New Castle
Presiding Judge:Judge Sue L. Robinson
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions
Cause:15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. Neutrogena Corporation
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neutrogena Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.