Larry's Giant Subs, Inc. v. Gaston Capital Investments, Inc. et al
| Plaintiff: | Larry's Giant Subs, Inc. |
|---|
| Defendant: | Gaston Capital Investments, Inc. and Dwayne Gaston |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 3:2007cv00883 |
|---|
| Filed: | September 14, 2007 |
|---|
| |
| Court: | Florida Middle District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Jacksonville Office [ Court Info ] |
|---|
| County: | Duval |
|---|
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
|---|
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson |
|---|
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Contract - Franchise |
|---|
| Cause: | 28:1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
|---|
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
|---|
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
|---|
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| September 18, 2007 | 4 |  ORDER. The Court reserves judgment on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunctive Relieve 3 until after a hearing on the matter. A hearing shall be held on LGSI's request for a temporary restraining or der on Tuesday, September 25, 2007, at 4:00 p.m. This hearing shall be held in Courtroom 10D, U.S. Courthouse, 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida, 32202. LGSI shall promptly serve upon both defendants copies of this Order, LGSI's mo tion 3, and the verified complaint 1. LGSI shall promptly file proof of such service once accomplished. The defendants shall file a memorandum in response to LGSI's motion, and any affidavits, by 5:00 p.m., on Monday, September 24, 2007. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/18/2007. (WBR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.