Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

SHORELINE TRANSPORTATION v. EVERGREEN TRANSPORTATION INC

Plaintiff:SHORELINE TRANSPORTATION
Defendant:Evergreen Transportation, Inc.
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00050
Filed:February 11, 2009
 
Court:Florida Northern District Court
Office:Contract: Other Office [ Court Info ]
County:Escambia
Presiding Judge:District Judge M CASEY RODGERS
Referring Judge:MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:Diversity
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:28:1330 Breach of Contract
Amount Demanded:$14,000,000,000.00
Search for this case: SHORELINE TRANSPORTATION v. EVERGREEN TRANSPORTATION INC
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evergreen Transportation, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHORELINE TRANSPORTATION
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.