Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Mount Zion Apostolic Temple, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Mount Zion Apostolic Temple, Inc.
Defendant:Scottsdale Insurance Company
 
Case Number:1:2009cv22149
Filed:July 22, 2009
 
Court:Florida Southern District Court
Office:Miami Office [ Court Info ]
County:Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge:Judge Adalberto Jordan
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Defendant
Amount Demanded:$321,000.00
Search for this case: Mount Zion Apostolic Temple, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mount Zion Apostolic Temple, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.