Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Russo v. Cold Air Distributors Warehouse of Florida, Inc.

Plaintiff:Michael Russo
Defendant:Cold Air Distributors Warehouse of Florida, Inc.
 
Case Number:9:2008cv80004
Filed:January 3, 2008
 
Court:Florida Southern District Court
Office:West Palm Beach Office [ Court Info ]
County:Palm Beach
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Ann E. Vitunac
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause:29:0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Russo v. Cold Air Distributors Warehouse of Florida, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Russo
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cold Air Distributors Warehouse of Florida, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.