Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation v. BH Aircraft Company Inc

Plaintiff:Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation
Defendant:BH Aircraft Company Inc
 
Case Number:7:2009cv00086
Filed:July 8, 2009
 
Court:Georgia Middle District Court
Office:Valdosta Office [ Court Info ]
County:Thomas
Presiding Judge:Judge Hugh Lawson
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$143,000.00
Search for this case: Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation v. BH Aircraft Company Inc
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Turbine Engine Components Technologies Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BH Aircraft Company Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.