Grandinetti vs. Frank, et al.
| Plaintiff: | Francis P. Grandinetti |
|---|
| Defendant: | Clayton A. Frank, David F. Festerling, Tommy Johnson and James L. Propotnick |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 1:2007cv00488 |
| Filed: | September 24, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Hawaii District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Hawaii Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Honolulu |
| Presiding Judge: | JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Referring Judge: | JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | P. Petitions - Prison Condition |
| Cause: | 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| September 26, 2007 | 5 | ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; AND TERMINATING ACTION 2 - Signed by Judge SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/26/07. [1. Grandinetti's complaint and action are DISMISSED. Specifically, Grandinetti's claim relating to illegal transfer is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Grandinetti's imminent injury claims, insofar as they are alleged against named Defendants, are DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. 2. Grandinetti's motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.3. The court declines to transfer this action. 4. With the exception of a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Grandinetti will not be allowed to file any further documents in this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file and NOT TO RETURN further filings to Grandinetti.] (emt, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.