Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Rebuilders Automotive Supply Co., Inc. v. HR & M Compressors, Inc.

Plaintiff:Rebuilders Automotive Supply Co., Inc.
Defendant:HR & M Compressors, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00496
Filed:October 19, 2009
 
Court:Hawaii District Court
Office:Hawaii Office [ Court Info ]
County:Outside state of Hawaii
Presiding Judge:JUDGE ALAN C KAY
Referring Judge:JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$457,000.00
Search for this case: Rebuilders Automotive Supply Co., Inc. v. HR & M Compressors, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebuilders Automotive Supply Co., Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HR & M Compressors, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.