Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Porter v. United States of America

Petitioner:Eugene Darwin Porter
Respondent:United States of America
 
Case Number:1:2007cv00005
Filed:January 16, 2007
 
Court:Iowa Northern District Court
Office:Cedar Rapids Office [ Court Info ]
County:Linn
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Linda R Reade
Referring Judge:Chief Magistrate John A Jarvey
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause:28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Porter v. United States of America
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eugene Darwin Porter
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.