Karagi v. United States Post Office et al
| Plaintiff: | Kalinga Karagi, Sr |
|---|
| Defendant: | United States Post Office, DHS, INS and Custom Woodworks |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 5:2007cv04055 |
| Filed: | July 16, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Iowa Northern District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Western Division Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Woodbury |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Mark W Bennett |
| Referring Judge: | Chief Magistrate Paul A Zoss |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause: | 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. Government Defendant |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| July 20, 2007 | 4 | Initial Review ORDER re 3 MOTION For Review Case CDCD120102 Dissolution Filed on 06/24/04, In The State District Court Woodbury County, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kalinga Karagi, Sr. The court finds the plaintiff ha s failed to state a claim against any defendant for which relief may be granted. The court therefore denies the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and this action is dismissed without prejudice. The court's dismissal of this action also applies to the plaintiff's motion 3 filed on 07/20/07, for review of a state court order regarding child custody and visitation in an action for dissolution of marriage. Federal courts lack jurisdiction to issue divorce, alimony, and child custody decrees. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Paul A Zoss on 07/20/07. (Copy of pleading with NEF to non-ECF party.)(ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.