Folkers v. Waterloo Iowa City of et al
| Plaintiff: | Russell A Folkers |
|---|
| Defendant: | Waterloo Iowa City of, Darrel Johnson and Maria Tiller |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 6:2007cv02066 |
| Filed: | September 25, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Iowa Northern District Court |
|---|
| Office: | Civil Rights: Other Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Black Hawk |
| Presiding Judge: | Senior Judge Edward J McManus |
| Presiding Judge: | Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause: | Federal Question |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| October 2, 2007 | 7 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The court recommends granting 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Russell A Folkers; Motions no longer referred to Magistrate Judge 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order; It is further recommended that the District Court set Plaintiff's request for temporary injunction down for hearing. Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2007. Signed by Judge Jon S Scoles on 10/2/2007. (de) |
| October 2, 2007 | 8 | ORDER deferring ruling on 4 Motion for TRO; and adopting Report and Recommendations re 7. The Waterloo City Council is stayed and prohibited from proceeding with an appeal hearing on this matter until the court has had an opportunity to consider plaintiff's request for a P.I. This matter is further referred to the Magistrate Judge for a R&R on plaintiff's request for a P.I. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J McManus on 10/2/2007. (de) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.