Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Flowers v. Glen Ellyn Moving Company

Plaintiff:Warren C. Flowers
Defendant:Glen Ellyn Moving Company
 
Case Number:1:2008cv00459
Filed:February 18, 2009
 
Court:Illinois Northern District Court
Office:Civil Rights: Jobs Office [ Court Info ]
County:Cook
Presiding Judge:Honorable Wayne R. Andersen
Referring Judge:Honorable Martin C. Ashman
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Amount Demanded:$1,500,000.00
Search for this case: Flowers v. Glen Ellyn Moving Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren C. Flowers
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glen Ellyn Moving Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.