Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Indiana Freight Service, Inc. II

Plaintiff:C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:Indiana Freight Service, Inc. II
 
Case Number:1:2009cv06583
Filed:October 20, 2009
 
Court:Illinois Northern District Court
Office:Chicago Office [ Court Info ]
County:Cook
Presiding Judge:Honorable Wayne R. Andersen
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause:28:1331 Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$25,000.00
Search for this case: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Indiana Freight Service, Inc. II
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana Freight Service, Inc. II
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.