Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Massac County/Metropolis E-911 v. Colossus Incorporated

Plaintiff:Massac County/Metropolis E-911
Defendant:Colossus Incorporated
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00728
Filed:September 15, 2009
 
Court:Illinois Southern District Court
Office:East St. Louis Office [ Court Info ]
County:Massac
Presiding Judge:Judge William D. Stiehl
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Both
Amount Demanded:$117,000.00
Search for this case: Massac County/Metropolis E-911 v. Colossus Incorporated
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Massac County/Metropolis E-911
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colossus Incorporated
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.