Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Peoples National Bank, N.A. et al v. American Coal Company, The

Plaintiff:Peoples National Bank, N.A.
Defendant:American Coal Company, The
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00761
Filed:September 18, 2009
 
Court:Illinois Southern District Court
Office:East St. Louis Office [ Court Info ]
County:Jefferson
Presiding Judge:Judge G. Patrick Murphy
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$774,000.00
Search for this case: Peoples National Bank, N.A. et al v. American Coal Company, The
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peoples National Bank, N.A.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Coal Company, The
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.