Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Mitchell v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC

Plaintiff:Michael Mitchell
Defendant:Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
 
Case Number:2:2009cv03513
Filed:May 11, 2009
 
Court:Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office:New Orleans Office [ Court Info ]
County:St Tammany
Presiding Judge:Judge Carl Barbier
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Consumer Credit
Cause:15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Mitchell v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Mitchell
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.