Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation v. Beaird Company, Ltd.

Plaintiff:Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation
Defendant:Beaird Company, Ltd.
 
Case Number:3:2008cv00712
Filed:October 30, 2008
 
Court:Louisiana Middle District Court
Office:Contract: Other Office [ Court Info ]
County:East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge:Judge James J. Brady
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Christine Noland
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:Diversity
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Amount Demanded:$85,067,000.00
Search for this case: Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation v. Beaird Company, Ltd.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beaird Company, Ltd.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.