Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Saunders v. Aecom Government Services Inc

Plaintiff: Charles Robert Saunders
Defendant: Aecom Government Services Inc
 
Case Number: 2:2008cv00627
Filed: May 8, 2008
 
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Labor: Other Office [ Court Info ]
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Judge James T Trimble Jr
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay
 
Nature of Suit: Labor - Other Labor Litigation
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Search for this case: Saunders v. Aecom Government Services Inc
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aecom Government Services Inc
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Saunders
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.