Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Heinzen v. Tetra Applied Technologies L P

Plaintiff: Larry Heinzen
Defendant: Tetra Applied Technologies, L.P.
 
Case Number: 6:2008cv00597
Filed: May 1, 2008
 
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Marine Office [ Court Info ]
County: East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge: Chief Judge Richard T Haik Sr
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Mildred E Methvin
 
Nature of Suit: Torts - Injury - Marine
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 43:1331 General Maritime/OCSLA
Amount Demanded: $3,000,000.00
Search for this case: Heinzen v. Tetra Applied Technologies L P
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tetra Applied Technologies, L.P.
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Heinzen
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.