Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

United States of America v. TITUS

Plaintiff:United States of America
Defendant:DONALD TITUS, II
 
Case Number:1:2009cv10323
Filed:March 4, 2009
 
Court:Massachusetts District Court
Office:Contract: Recovery Student Loan Office [ Court Info ]
County:Bristol
Presiding Judge:Judge Patti B. Saris
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
Cause:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:28:1345 Default of Student Loan
Amount Demanded:$12,000.00
Search for this case: United States of America v. TITUS
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONALD TITUS, II
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.