Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Burwell v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad

Plaintiff:Lorinza Burwell
Defendant:Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad
 
Case Number:1:2009cv10540
Filed:April 8, 2009
 
Court:Massachusetts District Court
Office:Federal Employer's Liability Office [ Court Info ]
County:Suffolk
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin
Presiding Judge:Judge Richard G. Stearns
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Federal Employers Liability
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Amount Demanded:$500,000.00
Search for this case: Burwell v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorinza Burwell
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.