Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Maguire v. CSX Transportation Inc.

Plaintiff:Paul M Maguire
Defendant:CSX Transportation Inc.
 
Case Number:3:2009cv30172
Filed:October 13, 2009
 
Court:Massachusetts District Court
Office:Springfield Office [ Court Info ]
County:Hampden
Presiding Judge:Judge Michael A Ponsor
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Federal Employers Liability
Cause:45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$150,000.00
Search for this case: Maguire v. CSX Transportation Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul M Maguire
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.