Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Longlac Wood Industries, Inc. v. Supra Floors Inc.

 
Case Number:1:2005cv03013
Filed:November 4, 2005
 
Court:Maryland District Court
Office:Baltimore Office [ Court Info ]
Presiding Judge:Judge Andre M Davis
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:35:145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Longlac Wood Industries, Inc. v. Supra Floors Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search for: Longlac Wood Industries, Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Search for: Supra Floors Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.