Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Rhoades v. George Weston Bakeries Distribution, Inc.

Plaintiff:Glen W. Rhoades
Defendant:George Weston Bakeries Distribution, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2007cv02389
Filed:September 7, 2007
 
Court:Maryland District Court
Office:Contract: Other Office [ Court Info ]
County:Allegany
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Benson Everett Legg
Referring Judge:Magistrate James K. Bredar
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:Diversity
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Amount Demanded:$1,700,000.00
Search for this case: Rhoades v. George Weston Bakeries Distribution, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen W. Rhoades
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Weston Bakeries Distribution, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.