Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Toppin v. National Credit Systems Maryland, Inc.

Plaintiff:Ann M. Toppin
Defendant:National Credit Systems Maryland, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2008cv03466
Filed:December 29, 2008
 
Court:Maryland District Court
Office:Consumer Credit Office [ Court Info ]
County:Howard
Presiding Judge:Judge Catherine C. Blake
Presiding Judge:Magistrate James K. Bredar
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Consumer Credit
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Search for this case: Toppin v. National Credit Systems Maryland, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann M. Toppin
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Credit Systems Maryland, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.