Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Miller v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

Plaintiff:Thomas Miller
Defendant:Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00639
Filed:March 12, 2009
 
Court:Maryland District Court
Office:Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office [ Court Info ]
County:Baltimore City
Presiding Judge:Judge Catherine C. Blake
Presiding Judge:Judge William D Quarles Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause:Diversity
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Amount Demanded:$9,999,000.00
Search for this case: Miller v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Miller
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.