Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Parsons

Plaintiff:Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:Michael J. Parsons
 
Case Number:2:2009cv12614
Filed:July 2, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Eastern District Court
Office:Detroit Office [ Court Info ]
County:Wayne
Presiding Judge: Friedman
Referring Judge: Whalen
 
Nature of Suit:Real Property - Torts to Land
Cause:42:1396 - Tort Negligence
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$1,200,000.00
Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Parsons
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Parsons
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.