Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Illinois Central Railway Company v. R M Storage, Incorporated

Plaintiff:Illinois Central Railway Company
Defendant:R M Storage, Incorporated
 
Case Number:2:2009cv12812
Filed:July 16, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Eastern District Court
Office:Detroit Office [ Court Info ]
County:Ottawa
Presiding Judge: Roberts
Referring Judge: Majzoub
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Consumer Credit
Cause:28:1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$9,782,000.00
Search for this case: Illinois Central Railway Company v. R M Storage, Incorporated
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Illinois Central Railway Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R M Storage, Incorporated
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.