Alfenas v. Pantera Partnership et al
Plaintiff Leif Alfenas alleges that defendant Pantera Partnership acquiesced to his publication of a non-commercial fan appreciation website at Pantera.com and that defendant had abandoned its rights to the trademark PANTERA.
| Leif Alfenas |
| Pantera Partnership, Vincent Paul Abbott, Philip Hanson Anselmo, Rex Robert Brown and Estate of Darell Lance ("Dimebag Darrell") Abbott |
| 1:2007cv00749 |
| August 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Wayne |
| Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
Filing
7
REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks on the transfer of a TRADEMARK ACTION to the Eastern District of Michigan (rlw)
|
Filing
5
ORDER TO TRANSFER VENUE granting 3 unopposed motion to transfer case; case is transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan, to enable consolidation with Civil Action No. 2:2007cv13244; signed by Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen (Senior Judge Richard Alan Enslen, blb)
|
|
Filing
4
PROPOSED ORDER regarding Unopposed Motion to Transfer Venue by plaintiff Leif Alfenas (Grimm, Eric)
|
|
Filing
2
REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks on the filing of a TRADEMARK ACTION (bd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
