Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Bedenfield v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.

Plaintiff:Michael D. Bedenfield
Defendant:Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00546
Filed:June 11, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Western District Court
Office:Southern Division (1) Office [ Court Info ]
County:Jackson
Presiding Judge: Judge Robert J. Jonker
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$25,000.00
Search for this case: Bedenfield v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
plaintiff: Michael D. Bedenfield
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
defendant: Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.