Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Musashi Auto Parts Michigan, Inc.

Plaintiff:Bronson Methodist Hospital
Defendant:Musashi Auto Parts Michigan, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00641
Filed:July 13, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Western District Court
Office:Southern Division (1) Office [ Court Info ]
County:Kalamazoo
Presiding Judge: Judge Gordon J. Quist
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- ERISA
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$7,000.00
Search for this case: Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Musashi Auto Parts Michigan, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
plaintiff: Bronson Methodist Hospital
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
defendant: Musashi Auto Parts Michigan, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.