Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Moncivais v. Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.

Plaintiff:Paul Moncivais
Defendant:Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00848
Filed:September 11, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Western District Court
Office:Southern Division (1) Office [ Court Info ]
County:Ottawa
Presiding Judge: Judge Gordon J. Quist
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$75,000.00
Search for this case: Moncivais v. Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
plaintiff: Paul Moncivais
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
defendant: Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.