Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Reilly v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Plaintiff:Joshua Reilly
Defendant:Michigan Department of Corrections
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00892
Filed:September 28, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Western District Court
Office:Southern Division (1) Office [ Court Info ]
County:Wayne
Presiding Judge: Judge Janet T. Neff
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$25,000.00
Search for this case: Reilly v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
plaintiff: Joshua Reilly
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.