Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Taylor Technologies, Inc. v. Rand Imaginit Technologies, Inc

Plaintiff:Taylor Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:Rand Imaginit Technologies, Inc
 
Case Number:2:2009cv00217
Filed:October 7, 2009
 
Court:Michigan Western District Court
Office:Northern Division (2) Office [ Court Info ]
County:Dickinson
Presiding Judge: Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley
Presiding Judge: Judge Gordon J. Quist
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Taylor Technologies, Inc. v. Rand Imaginit Technologies, Inc
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
plaintiff: Taylor Technologies, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
defendant: Rand Imaginit Technologies, Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.