Innovative Medical Systems Inc et al v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
| Case Number: | 0:2004cv04705 |
|---|---|
| Filed: | November 2, 2004 |
| Court: | Minnesota District Court [ Court Info ] |
| Presiding Judge: | Michael J. Davis |
| Referring Judge: | Jonathan G Lebedoff |
| Nature of Suit: | Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Innovative Medical Systems Inc et al v. Augustine Medical, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Innovative Medical Systems Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Augustine Medical, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: Minnesota Criminal Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.